- Is postcyclic transmission underestimated as an epizootiological fact…
Number of the records: 1  

Is postcyclic transmission underestimated as an epizootiological factor for acanthocephalans?

  1. SYSr022094
    LBL
      
    ^^^^^naa--2200000-a-4500
    005
      
    20250607121408.8
    008
      
    030703c2003----xo-----e------------engo-
    040
      
    $a BA006 $b slo
    041
    0-
    $a eng $b eng
    044
      
    $a xo $c SK
    080
      
    $a 595.133:591.5:591.3 $2 2.
    100
    1-
    $7 sllk_us_auth*p0030653 $a Nickol, B. $u School of biological sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA $4 aut
    242
    10
    $a Je postcyklická transmisia podcenená ako epizootický faktor pre Acanthocephala?
    245
    10
    $a Is postcyclic transmission underestimated as an epizootiological factor for acanthocephalans? / $c B. Nickol
    300
      
    $b Tab.
    504
      
    $a Res. angl.
    504
      
    $a Bibliogr. odkazy
    650
    12
    $7 sllk_us_auth*d000049 $a Acanthocephala $x anatómia a histológia $x izolácia a purifikácia $x parazitológia $2 mesh $9 .
    650
    12
    $7 sllk_us_auth*d008018 $a štádiá životného cyklu, vývojové $x genetika $x imunológia $2 mesh $9 .
    650
    12
    $7 sllk_us_auth*d002965 $a klasifikácia $x metódy $2 mesh $9 .
    650
    22
    $7 sllk_us_auth*d000717 $a anatómia porovnávacia $x metódy $2 mesh $9 .
    650
    22
    $7 sllk_us_auth*d006790 $a interakcie hostiteľ-parazit $9 . $2 mesh
    773
    0-
    $7 nnas $w sllk_us_cat*sg000137_2003_003_002 $t Helminthologia $x 0440-6605 $d Bratislava : Slovak Academic Press $g Vol. 40, no. 2 (2003), s. 93-95
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.